I'm off shopping at my Local Tecco's

I was driving through Sale today, when I passed this shop - the local TECCO express store - The name reminds me of something, but I just can't put my finger on it... I like it, and hope they do not get sued...


Afterwards, I had to go to Liverpool (or at least, that's what I thought) to sort out a PC - and guess what? - It wasn't meant to be Liverpool, it was supposed to be Leicester and I messed up completely - talk about a nowhere boy...


I love this mural, sadly it's on a busy roundabout and I was just driving through  - I will try to get a better photo next time - better images can be found at:



also, check this blog: 

Another Day - Another Fine - I hate Bolton Council...

Today, Sunday, I Just got another fine for "Parking in a loading place during restricted hours without loading"  (Contravention Code. 25 - This is my second fine in as many days - The other was for for Overstaying my Parking by 6 minutes "Parked after the expiry of paid for time" (Contravention Code. 05) ...

I seem to get a ticket everywhere I go and every other day..  Bolton - Manchester - Liverpool - London - St. Helen's - Bristol - I really, really hate it, and people wonder why the High Street is dying.. Simple, the Greedy Bastards are running the asylum, and we have to pay for it - every bloody day...

The loading area in question, is at the back of a blocked street, with no loading bays, gates, doors, shops or anything else around, and it had not been used for at least 5 years.

I'm just looking for somebody to come with me one day and pretend to load things, from one car to the other; piss them off for a couple of hours, take some photos for the newspaper, get a couple of tickets, then leave...


 

We're in the money - Britain's Deficient Democracy

Original Article Here...

  The Windsors Pull A Fast One

"A mood of austerity may be stalking Britain, but the champagne is still flowing at Buckingham Palace"  Financial Times

Britain's parliament has given in to the Windsor clan and has set back British democracy by allowing the feudal family to reclaim some of the revenue from the Crown Estate, a vast real estate holding valued at £7.3bn that generated a suplus of £230.9 in 2010-11 and that belongs to the people. 

From 2011 the clan are to be given 15 per cent of the Estate's profits in place of the grants that have been paid since 1760. But if property prices fall, the clan will not lose out. It's income is guaranteed not to fall, no matter what happens in the property market. According to the Financial Times "The princely budgets will never be lesser than the previous year's. When the Crown Estate does well, royals win: when it does not, taxpayers lose". The Daily Mail has estimated that this could eventually mean the Windsors taking £68m a year, twice their current take, as wind farms increase the Estate's revenue. 

After many years of trying, the Windsors, with the shameful help of the government and opposition parties, have clawed back some of their lost feudal wealth and privilege. 

The Financial Times quoted a “government source” as saying that “The royal family must have been getting the champagne out when we conceded this. They have been trying for decades to persuade ministers to do it”.

According to the Daily Mail, a conservative newspaper, the decision to change the funding arrangement, which was announced without fanfare, was a “masterstroke” by Charles Windsor’s chief adviser, Michael Peat. According to the newspaper “250 year of history was overturned” by the decision to allow the Windsors to get their hands on income that has been recognised since 1760 as belonging to the people of Britain. In 1760 the German side of the family had not yet emigrated to this country.

"One could say they have pulled a fast one"
The Windsor clan has been pressing to receive income from the Estate for over 100 years. Charles Windsor, who is due to become head of state on the death of this mother, has pushed for it for 20 years. But until now the Windsors’ claim that the Crown Estate belongs to them has been resisted by governments of all parties.

A Mail source told the newspaper that “Charles (Windsor) has always believed the money from the Crown Estate as taken away from the family. Now they have got it back. One could say they have pulled a fast one”.

But this is about more than the money. It is also about the freedom that the money will give members of the feudal institution. And it is about a rolling back of the democratic progress that has reduced the privileges of the Windsors and expanded the rights of the people.

The new concession will free the family from the limited accountability to the people it has had. In a related development the government has made the Windsors exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, so that their activities in general will be shielded from public scrutiny.

In his biography of Mr. Windsor, Jonathan Dimbleby quoted people close to him as saying he believed that the income from the Crown Estate would help create “an independent and vigorous” monarchy. 

Philip Hall, author of Royal Fortune - Tax, Money and the Monarchy, told the Financial Times that Windsor “probably more so than the Queen, seems to be staking out some kind of new role”.

And because the Windsor believe the Crown Estate is not the property of the people, the new arrangement will allow them to lie that the feudal institution costs the people nothing. According to the Financial Times Windsor staff find it “unedifying” to have to justify their spending of the money the people give them.

Rupert Ponsonby, a Conservative legislator-for-life, told the House of Lords that the new funding proposal was “appropriate because the Crown Estate remains the property of the Queen as sovereign”. A “government source” refuted this, telling the Financial Times “There is a major constitutional issue with appearing to say that (Elizabeth Windsor) owns all this stuff when she doesn’t”.

Sovereign Support Grant
The proposed change in the form of public handouts was announced in October. Chancellor George Osborne said the feudal family would be allowed 15% of the Estate’s profits by means of a “Sovereign Support Grant”, in place of the current annual handouts known as the “Civil List”. He described the 15% Windsor cut of Estate income as “an indicative figure” and said there would be safeguards to limit the family’s income. The National Audit Office will also be able to examine the new grant.

But this form of handout would end the current limited public scrutiny of the Windsor finances that their dependence on the “civil list” grants gives. According to the Daily Mail it will send £68m a year streaming into the family’s bank account. If present trends continue they would also be guaranteed an annual increase. 

The huge size of the payments would result from the development of offshore wind farms. The seabed on which they will be based is public property owned by the Crown Estate. Wind farm owners pay the Estate a fee to run cables across the seabed and a percentage of the income from electricity generation. 

Doubling Their Money
The Estate says that its profits from the wind farms could reach £100m a year, giving £15m annually to the family. However, industry experts told the Mail that by 2020 income could reach £250m, £37.5 of which would be passed on to the Windsors. In total their 15% of Crown Estate profits would amount to £68m, more than double their current handout.

This Windsor triumph has taken Britain backwards, further away from a break with the feudal past, further away from fully democratic institutions and further away from a democratic society. Mr. Windsor will be freer to use his privileged potion to advance his prejudices, which in the past have prevented modern architecture and promoted homoeopathic remedies at the expense of taxpayers.

The Windsors will be potentially much richer, in a stronger position to claim that they pay their own way, and able to increase their freedom to put pressure on the government with less worrying that parliament might rein them in.

As Britain has no written constitution, and effectively therefore, no constitution of any reliability, challenging constitutional attacks such as this is particularly difficult. The only safeguard is a legislature occupied by legislators who have sworn allegiance to the Windsor family.

The New Mircosoft Tablet....

- hhmmm... a Touch Pad with a Keyboard?..  So its a Laptop?

- Nope it's small, so its a notebook.

- Nope, it's a Lablet or a Noblet, depending on the model...



The New Lablet or a Noblet, (depending on the model)

Windows, Windows, Windows....

Problems, problems, problems all day long....

Windows Vista Update - “Configuring Updates Stage 3 of 3 0%”

Change Windows Shell - UKash Police Virus

Unable to turn Automatic Updates On

I hate Browser Toolbars

I hate Incredibar, I hate Babylon toolbar and I hate every other crappy toolbar on the planet.  I just installed an update to a program that resided on my PC for over a year; and I made the mistake of not reading or questioning the installation, so I just clicked, next, next, finish and trusted the vendors.

However; this managed to install original software plus, the Incredibar, the Babylon toolbar and a third party toolbar; it changed my home page and my search providers and started redirecting browser pages to God knows where; without even asking me.

I removed all toolbars and reset IE to its original factory settings; and I removed all Firefox toolbars / add-ons and reset my search providers / home page. 

And to make sure that all entries all deleted; I cleared all the cache; emptied all temporary folders; removed all keys from the registry and installed Spybot Search & Destroy, to finish the job and to remove all traces of those toolbars.

So guess what Spybot S&D hint of the day was:-


Hint of the Day:
Caution! Products from Trend Micro or McAfee might be regarded as malware!

According to the the antispyware coalition's definition, programs, such as McAfee and Trend Micro might be considered Spyware and / or PUPS, which it defines as: "Technologies [...] implemented in ways that impair user control over [...] Material changes that affect their [...] system security;"

I always suspected that, and if it wasn't true; then I'm sure that some, slick, expensive corporate lawyers would have sued the pants off S&D.